My slight sticking point is with:
Quote:
Do you believe that only things which can be demonstrated to be true are valid beliefs.
I think I know why this is foolishness but I'm not sure.
I think it's kind of a trap question.
And also, if something is demonstrably true, then surely it's a fact? Facts do not require belief. You can believe what you like - The sun travels round the earth, the earth's core is filled with marshmallows, whatever - but scientific fact says that you're wrong and in fact Earth orbits the Sun which in turn orbits the Galactic centre and the Earth's core is molten rock.
LATER:
I looked at some forum posts you linked to, and discovered this little gem:
syetenb wrote:
The argument is that God is the precondition of intelligibility. If the Bible were untrue, you could never know that it was untrue, because you lose the foundations of intelligibility with which you criticize it
Wow. Just wow.