solo2 wrote:
It wouldn't be very creative if they were suitable statements.
Also, she's a little kid...
I hate the quoting system on here, I had to wade through like six quote boxes to get what I wanted.
The creativity would like in creating a story out of it, not just stringing random, inapplicable sentences to pictures. Any kid can pick up a book and say something irrelevant about a picture, I don't see how that's creative?
And I know she's a little kid. I'm saying all this relative to that. When I was a kid that small I was writing copies full of stories and illustrating them, and I'm not exactly of above average intelligence or creativity now. So I don't see how she's any more creative, coherent or whatever than any other child, is all I'm saying. I don't get why it's cute or clever. It's random babbling about cats.
This reminds me - on my book forum, a mum proudly said how her kid had taken his first half dozen steps without any support. Now, of course that's great and something to document and all, coz it's her kid. But people started saying, 'what a clever child!' and 'you've got a special little boy there!'
Em. Well, no. He'd be special alright if he couldn't walk, he'd the the kind of 'special' you put airquotes around, and he'd definately be clever had he been a parapalegic prior to the event, but other than that, no, neither clever nor special - perfectly average and normal.
Zippy - I've always been cynical. And I despise small children.